Can capitalism save nature? Here’s a 7-step solution
Move over, tree huggers. Potato farmers, urban planners and mountain bikers are the new vanguard of biodiversity.
Call it Conservation 3.0.
The big UN biodiversity conference in Montreal this week will see a shift from forests to finance as the host country Canada looks to capitalism to unleash trillions of dollars needed for the protection and enhancement of nature, and fight climate change.
If Conservation 1.0 was about ring-fencing nature, going back to the tragedy of the commons in the 1800s, and Conservation 2.0 was about integrating nature and development, a new chapter of biodiversity thinking has turned to the economics of ecology. With a capitalist bent.
Nature as an “asset class” will be a major theme at the United Nations Conference of the Parties – yes, another COP – as the UN tries to advance its Convention on Biological Diversity.
Over the past 30 years, since the first Earth Summit in Rio, the world has slashed our natural capital per capita by 40% while doubling production per capita. It’s not all bad news. Nature United and its global partners figure soil, trees and water could absorb 37% of current greenhouse gas emissions. But we need to move fast to restore what’s been lost.
Canada is pushing countries to adopt a 30-by-30 goal, to ensure 30% of nature is protected by 2030. The UN says we will need to get to 50% to mitigate climate change to, too.
Here’s some of what business can do to help regain the balance:
- Give nature a business model
Business models can be anathema to some nature lovers, but they may be the only way to generate the revenue needed to attract capital to enhance forests, land and water. The current gap is about $700 billion, far more than governments and philanthropists can cover. But here’s the thing: nature already powers our economy, accounting for roughly 12% of GDP, and is critical to countless businesses beyond the extractive sectors like mining and forestry. According to the World Economic Forum, as much as half the world’s economic output – $44 trillion – is highly dependent on nature. Just ask a coalition of resorts in Cancun, Mexico that are investing in coral reef protection. No reef, no business.
2. Set finance loose in the wild
Finance is already creating opportunities for nature, and will need to do a lot more. Consider a bike park in Akron, Ohio. The city was able to protect forests where bikers, rather than builders, could roam, and financed it with bonds backed by increased taxes from tourism. More significantly, governments are using green bonds to finance conservation, appealing to investors who want their money to support biodiversity while also generating funds to restore habitats. We’ll need a lot more. Of the $632 billion of climate capital invested in a typical year, only 2% goes to nature.
3. Think inset, not offset
The race to net zero has inspired a lot of companies to buy carbon offsets that finance nature-based solutions such as the planting of trees. A bigger opportunity may lie in “insets” that allow companies to pay for natural climate solutions through their own supply chain. Among the most popular insets now are “soil capture” investments that see farmers adopt regenerative agriculture practices, such as cover cropping, in return for money from food producers and retailers trying to reduce their own footprint. It’s not only economically powerful. It helps companies trace the roots of their production back to nature.
4. Develop housing within nature
Canada is going to see more tensions between people and nature as our population grows by 500,000 people a year through immigration. That will require a lot of new housing development, as the debate over Ontario’s green belt has shown. But the debate needn’t be binary, between sprawl and condos. Innovative urban design – and suburban design – is showing how more housing can be built sustainably using nature corridors, integrated wild lands and small-scale farming in the same vicinity.
5. Eat as if our lives depended on it
One reason for this year’s food crisis is that too much of the world’s diet depends on a small range of crops and animals. Roughly 75% of the world’s food comes from 12 plant and five animal species. Regardless of your food preferences, diversity is the spice of nature, and not only provides more interesting meal choices; it makes us all less dependent on monocultures. The World Economic Forum estimates $310 billion in business opportunities – equivalent of another Singapore – could be generated annually if we enhance biodiversity in our food systems.
6. Reward nature as your best employee
Every good asset manager knows you have to reinvest some of your proceeds if you want to keep growing your assets. A more capitalist approach to nature would see us place a clearer price on biodiversity, just as we have with carbon, and then funnel some of that price into restoration and enhancement. Such investments would be good for the economy, too. Consider natural sea walls that not only protect cities but help nurture sea life. Or storm sewers that keep runoffs from wiping out forests and fields. Just as with climate we will need new accounting methods and systems to measure the costs and benefits of nature, and build them into our economic equations.
7. See nature tech as a growth sector
Seems paradoxical to apply artificial intelligence to nature but scientists are – and it’s working. According to a Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) study, general purpose technologies like AI, remote sensors and environmental DNA are quickly helping us do more than count trees. Sophisticated AI-driven models linked to satellite imagery and ground sensors are allowing countries to map their natural assets and measure both depletion and growth. After all, what gets tracked gets measured, and what gets measured gets managed. With billions of dollars flowing into biodiversity, nature tech may just become a new asset class of its own.
